LAM IN THE UK Growing number of bumps in the Midst of Rapid
Official Name
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and the Northern Ireland
City mother
London
Coverage Area
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
State Forms
Constitutional Monarchy (Constitutional Monarchy)
Government System
Parliamentary Democracy
Constitutional Basis
Prevailing customs and traditions collected in stages
Large Parties
Labour Party and Conservative Party
Official Languages
English Language
Religion
Christian Protestant (majority), Catholic, Protestant, Presbyterian, Orthodox, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist.
Flag
The Union Jack
Area
243,305 km2
Population
On average 246 people per km2 (2001)
Currencies
Great Britain Pounds Sterling (GBP)
Foreign Policy
Protecting the security and enhance British influence in the international community, as well as support the creation of an international order that an orderly and safe
The entry of Islam to the UK
The presence of Islam in Britain can be traced since 300 years ago, which originated from recruitment of the sailors conducted by the East India Company from Yemen, Gujarat, Sind, Assam, and Bengal. They are used as soldiers. A small number of them then settled in port cities in the UK, especially London, Cerdiff, Liverpool, South Shields and Tyneside. Muslims in countries that have cultural roots that are different from each other.
Around the 19th century, a number of Muslim businessmen have also been trade to the kingdom. One of them is well-known companies 'Mohamed's Baths' which was founded in Brighton by Sake Deen Mohammed (1750-1851). In addition to workers and traders, in the late 19th century, started to go well into English intellectual group. This can be seen when the period between 1893 until 1908, a weekly journal of Islamic nuanced, The Crescent, began to spread in Liverpool. The founder of this journal is William Henry Quilliam (which in the Muslim community is known as Sheikh Abdullah Quillam), who is a lawyer. He converted to Islam in 1887 after a long settled in Algeria and Morocco. Coupled with a wave of Muslim migration en masse to England in the 1950s.
In 1951, the country's Muslim population estimated to reach 23 thousand inhabitants. Ten years later, the Muslim population in Britain to 82 thousand, and in 1971 has reached 369 thousand inhabitants. Currently, the Muslim population in the UK around 2 million inhabitants. Swelling numbers of this migration, especially from the former British colonies such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, due to the availability of employment opportunities in the UK, especially steel and textile industries are growing rapidly in Yokshire and Lanchasire. Issuance of the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1962, which increasingly provide facilities for UK citizenship to nationals of the former British colony, also helped push the rate of this migration.
The development of Islam and Muslims Position
Before the tragedy of 11 September, the development of Islam in this country very rapidly. In terms of quantity can be seen from the developments mentioned above. Likewise, in terms of quality, the Muslims there are not many get difficulties when trying to implement keberagamaannya. This is supported by the UK government policy which expressly release all its citizens to embrace and implement the teachings of his religion. That is, every British citizen is not restricted and prohibited to embrace a religion of any kind. State does not issue an official religion recognized by the state. Every citizen can embrace any religion (including no religion in it though) even though the new religion, including running the entire teaching. In addition, it supported also by the attitude of British society are very indifferent to the existence of religion as long as they do not feel disturbed. From this end the development of Islam so fast.
However, behind which there is freedom there are wedge-wedge developed collectively by both government and existing groups. For example, until recently, many of the younger generation that the average Muslim from South Asia is experiencing a great struggle is complex, especially related to persoalanan their identity as Muslims. They tend to be easy teralienasikan from frame kemuslimannya as a result of high unemployment, lack of opportunity to acquire education, the quality of faith, the question of women's lives in a public space, the bias of the media perspective to racial issues.
Especially after the tragedy of 11 September 2001, which turned out to give a very great impact for Muslims in Britain. It's no longer about issues, but more than that, acts of racial far only few in number befall the Muslims there, after the tragedy, in terms of quantity more often experienced by Muslims in various sectors of life. Plural racist attitudes seen in places where the cultural center of Islam. It often happens, some of the Muslims who have traveled similar measures at airports or railway stations internationally. To reduce possible negative impacts experienced by the Muslim community, a day after the attack, Prime Minister Tony Blair declared, "a reprehensible act (WTC bombing) was in stark contrast with Islamic values. Vast majority of Muslims are very flexible, honest people, who are also experiencing the same horror of what had happened. "
However, after this tragedy is also a change of government attitude towards the Muslim community. When this has been specially appointed by the British Parliament some experts that was tasked to study Islam in detail to help political decision-making related to the Islamic community. From this position of the Muslims there began experiencing a number of barriers to systemic marginalization.
Utilizing Existing Momentum
If we look deeper, as if the measures taken by Prime Minister Tony Blair related to domestic and foreign policies contradict one another. However, if traced further, it turns out what is retrieved instead mutually reinforcing. Indeed, if judging from his foreign policy, the British tend against Islam. This condition is seen in how the UK with the U.S. insistence on attacking Afghanistan and Iraq which explicitly implies hatred for Islam. Not to the roots of history, which destroyed Daula Inggrislah Khilfah Islamiyah in Istanbul Turkey. Through the cruel conspiracy along with his minions (Mustafa Kemal, etc.), they are berlahan but certainly further undermine and overthrow the Caliphate as well as replacing it with British-style secular government. From here can be understood why in the framework of its foreign policy, Britain was 'dark eyes' of Islamic countries.
However, the opposite policy, namely to protect Muslims, captured in the British domestic political policy. Not only Muslims who have long become citizens, but Muslim leaders escape from various Muslim countries could also be easily obtain asylum to further continue its activities as is done in his native country. That is, all Muslims, as long as he remains a British citizen, will always be defended and protected, both when he was in British territory or not. Although their ideas are very opposed or tended to contradict the government's policies, they are free to do so.
Policies that seems ambiguous between one another, if we trace further not contradict each other. Indeed, there is in accordance with the doctrine of his foreign policy, namely to protect the security and enhance British influence in the international community, as well as support the creation of an international order that an orderly and safe.
However, in practical policy on emerging as a result of the first: UK institution to regulate and protect the freedom of every individual to express and issue opinions. The British government wanted to remain self-image as a democratic state that continues to uphold democratic principles and human rights. Therefore, every citizen is guaranteed freedom despite contrary opinions issued by the government or even tend to be insulting. As an example of what happens in a demonstration against Blair's policy of attacking Iraq. The protesters describe Blair as Bush's stooge with replication Bush as host, while Blair as a pet dog. This humiliation was not prosecuted at all by the government. This condition shows how freedom of expression is upheld. Islamic figures can freely without any sense of worry-affected legislation convey anti-subversive-Islamic ideas that in fact contradict frontally with secular ideology promoted by the British government. With this freedom also, they can easily convey the ideas of Islam to the general public and then invite them to apply Islamic law in everyday life.
Second, to deal with American politics. We know very well that the Islamic leaders who are vocal in essence, constantly attacking U.S. politics. These conditions produce benefits for the UK. Although there is no difference ideologically, there is a difference between the UK with U.S. interests, either in economics or in some other cases. This difference is then triggered the British tried to translate its policy for its foreign policy doctrine still achieved. On the one hand English is loyal U.S. ally who will always be asked for help to solve existing problems. But on the other hand, Britain is actually a U.S. rival to be reckoned with. UK foreign policy similar to the U.S. clearly will lead to any conflicts of interest. An example is in case of dispute about economic interests in the Middle East. Britain has long been planted its agents in the Middle East to secure its interests. However, since the Gulf War I had ended, stability and existence of the interests of British agents in the Middle East began to shift or even eroded by the interests and U.S. agents. Oil fields and other crops began to be sucked into the U.S.. Not to mention the level of loyalty of the leaders in Muslim countries. At first, we can be sure that they all were British agents. However, post-Gulf War I his condition began to change. They began to give their loyalty to the U.S.. This condition is very detrimental to British interests.
From here why in the end with the introduction of Islamic leaders who are critical of the U.S. in the UK would be 'blessing' for the UK alone. Their presence then transformed into a form of real support from one of the components of society to win the competition with the U.S.. In addition, they also become places of production 'weapon' powerful criticism easily available to be used to criticize U.S. policy. However, this policy would also be a 'blessing' the other for the development of Islam in Britain.
From here it is clear, that although the look contradictory, essentially foreign and domestic policy of England remains the same, namely to the progress and glory of England alone
Rabu, 01 Juni 2011
islam in inggris
LAM IN THE UK Growing number of bumps in the Midst of Rapid
Official Name
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and the Northern Ireland
City mother
London
Coverage Area
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
State Forms
Constitutional Monarchy (Constitutional Monarchy)
Government System
Parliamentary Democracy
Constitutional Basis
Prevailing customs and traditions collected in stages
Large Parties
Labour Party and Conservative Party
Official Languages
English Language
Religion
Christian Protestant (majority), Catholic, Protestant, Presbyterian, Orthodox, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist.
Flag
The Union Jack
Area
243,305 km2
Population
On average 246 people per km2 (2001)
Currencies
Great Britain Pounds Sterling (GBP)
Foreign Policy
Protecting the security and enhance British influence in the international community, as well as support the creation of an international order that an orderly and safe
The entry of Islam to the UK
The presence of Islam in Britain can be traced since 300 years ago, which originated from recruitment of the sailors conducted by the East India Company from Yemen, Gujarat, Sind, Assam, and Bengal. They are used as soldiers. A small number of them then settled in port cities in the UK, especially London, Cerdiff, Liverpool, South Shields and Tyneside. Muslims in countries that have cultural roots that are different from each other.
Around the 19th century, a number of Muslim businessmen have also been trade to the kingdom. One of them is well-known companies 'Mohamed's Baths' which was founded in Brighton by Sake Deen Mohammed (1750-1851). In addition to workers and traders, in the late 19th century, started to go well into English intellectual group. This can be seen when the period between 1893 until 1908, a weekly journal of Islamic nuanced, The Crescent, began to spread in Liverpool. The founder of this journal is William Henry Quilliam (which in the Muslim community is known as Sheikh Abdullah Quillam), who is a lawyer. He converted to Islam in 1887 after a long settled in Algeria and Morocco. Coupled with a wave of Muslim migration en masse to England in the 1950s.
In 1951, the country's Muslim population estimated to reach 23 thousand inhabitants. Ten years later, the Muslim population in Britain to 82 thousand, and in 1971 has reached 369 thousand inhabitants. Currently, the Muslim population in the UK around 2 million inhabitants. Swelling numbers of this migration, especially from the former British colonies such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, due to the availability of employment opportunities in the UK, especially steel and textile industries are growing rapidly in Yokshire and Lanchasire. Issuance of the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1962, which increasingly provide facilities for UK citizenship to nationals of the former British colony, also helped push the rate of this migration.
The development of Islam and Muslims Position
Before the tragedy of 11 September, the development of Islam in this country very rapidly. In terms of quantity can be seen from the developments mentioned above. Likewise, in terms of quality, the Muslims there are not many get difficulties when trying to implement keberagamaannya. This is supported by the UK government policy which expressly release all its citizens to embrace and implement the teachings of his religion. That is, every British citizen is not restricted and prohibited to embrace a religion of any kind. State does not issue an official religion recognized by the state. Every citizen can embrace any religion (including no religion in it though) even though the new religion, including running the entire teaching. In addition, it supported also by the attitude of British society are very indifferent to the existence of religion as long as they do not feel disturbed. From this end the development of Islam so fast.
However, behind which there is freedom there are wedge-wedge developed collectively by both government and existing groups. For example, until recently, many of the younger generation that the average Muslim from South Asia is experiencing a great struggle is complex, especially related to persoalanan their identity as Muslims. They tend to be easy teralienasikan from frame kemuslimannya as a result of high unemployment, lack of opportunity to acquire education, the quality of faith, the question of women's lives in a public space, the bias of the media perspective to racial issues.
Especially after the tragedy of 11 September 2001, which turned out to give a very great impact for Muslims in Britain. It's no longer about issues, but more than that, acts of racial far only few in number befall the Muslims there, after the tragedy, in terms of quantity more often experienced by Muslims in various sectors of life. Plural racist attitudes seen in places where the cultural center of Islam. It often happens, some of the Muslims who have traveled similar measures at airports or railway stations internationally. To reduce possible negative impacts experienced by the Muslim community, a day after the attack, Prime Minister Tony Blair declared, "a reprehensible act (WTC bombing) was in stark contrast with Islamic values. Vast majority of Muslims are very flexible, honest people, who are also experiencing the same horror of what had happened. "
However, after this tragedy is also a change of government attitude towards the Muslim community. When this has been specially appointed by the British Parliament some experts that was tasked to study Islam in detail to help political decision-making related to the Islamic community. From this position of the Muslims there began experiencing a number of barriers to systemic marginalization.
Utilizing Existing Momentum
If we look deeper, as if the measures taken by Prime Minister Tony Blair related to domestic and foreign policies contradict one another. However, if traced further, it turns out what is retrieved instead mutually reinforcing. Indeed, if judging from his foreign policy, the British tend against Islam. This condition is seen in how the UK with the U.S. insistence on attacking Afghanistan and Iraq which explicitly implies hatred for Islam. Not to the roots of history, which destroyed Daula Inggrislah Khilfah Islamiyah in Istanbul Turkey. Through the cruel conspiracy along with his minions (Mustafa Kemal, etc.), they are berlahan but certainly further undermine and overthrow the Caliphate as well as replacing it with British-style secular government. From here can be understood why in the framework of its foreign policy, Britain was 'dark eyes' of Islamic countries.
However, the opposite policy, namely to protect Muslims, captured in the British domestic political policy. Not only Muslims who have long become citizens, but Muslim leaders escape from various Muslim countries could also be easily obtain asylum to further continue its activities as is done in his native country. That is, all Muslims, as long as he remains a British citizen, will always be defended and protected, both when he was in British territory or not. Although their ideas are very opposed or tended to contradict the government's policies, they are free to do so.
Policies that seems ambiguous between one another, if we trace further not contradict each other. Indeed, there is in accordance with the doctrine of his foreign policy, namely to protect the security and enhance British influence in the international community, as well as support the creation of an international order that an orderly and safe.
However, in practical policy on emerging as a result of the first: UK institution to regulate and protect the freedom of every individual to express and issue opinions. The British government wanted to remain self-image as a democratic state that continues to uphold democratic principles and human rights. Therefore, every citizen is guaranteed freedom despite contrary opinions issued by the government or even tend to be insulting. As an example of what happens in a demonstration against Blair's policy of attacking Iraq. The protesters describe Blair as Bush's stooge with replication Bush as host, while Blair as a pet dog. This humiliation was not prosecuted at all by the government. This condition shows how freedom of expression is upheld. Islamic figures can freely without any sense of worry-affected legislation convey anti-subversive-Islamic ideas that in fact contradict frontally with secular ideology promoted by the British government. With this freedom also, they can easily convey the ideas of Islam to the general public and then invite them to apply Islamic law in everyday life.
Second, to deal with American politics. We know very well that the Islamic leaders who are vocal in essence, constantly attacking U.S. politics. These conditions produce benefits for the UK. Although there is no difference ideologically, there is a difference between the UK with U.S. interests, either in economics or in some other cases. This difference is then triggered the British tried to translate its policy for its foreign policy doctrine still achieved. On the one hand English is loyal U.S. ally who will always be asked for help to solve existing problems. But on the other hand, Britain is actually a U.S. rival to be reckoned with. UK foreign policy similar to the U.S. clearly will lead to any conflicts of interest. An example is in case of dispute about economic interests in the Middle East. Britain has long been planted its agents in the Middle East to secure its interests. However, since the Gulf War I had ended, stability and existence of the interests of British agents in the Middle East began to shift or even eroded by the interests and U.S. agents. Oil fields and other crops began to be sucked into the U.S.. Not to mention the level of loyalty of the leaders in Muslim countries. At first, we can be sure that they all were British agents. However, post-Gulf War I his condition began to change. They began to give their loyalty to the U.S.. This condition is very detrimental to British interests.
From here why in the end with the introduction of Islamic leaders who are critical of the U.S. in the UK would be 'blessing' for the UK alone. Their presence then transformed into a form of real support from one of the components of society to win the competition with the U.S.. In addition, they also become places of production 'weapon' powerful criticism easily available to be used to criticize U.S. policy. However, this policy would also be a 'blessing' the other for the development of Islam in Britain.
From here it is clear, that although the look contradictory, essentially foreign and domestic policy of England remains the same, namely to the progress and glory of England alone
Official Name
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and the Northern Ireland
City mother
London
Coverage Area
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
State Forms
Constitutional Monarchy (Constitutional Monarchy)
Government System
Parliamentary Democracy
Constitutional Basis
Prevailing customs and traditions collected in stages
Large Parties
Labour Party and Conservative Party
Official Languages
English Language
Religion
Christian Protestant (majority), Catholic, Protestant, Presbyterian, Orthodox, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist.
Flag
The Union Jack
Area
243,305 km2
Population
On average 246 people per km2 (2001)
Currencies
Great Britain Pounds Sterling (GBP)
Foreign Policy
Protecting the security and enhance British influence in the international community, as well as support the creation of an international order that an orderly and safe
The entry of Islam to the UK
The presence of Islam in Britain can be traced since 300 years ago, which originated from recruitment of the sailors conducted by the East India Company from Yemen, Gujarat, Sind, Assam, and Bengal. They are used as soldiers. A small number of them then settled in port cities in the UK, especially London, Cerdiff, Liverpool, South Shields and Tyneside. Muslims in countries that have cultural roots that are different from each other.
Around the 19th century, a number of Muslim businessmen have also been trade to the kingdom. One of them is well-known companies 'Mohamed's Baths' which was founded in Brighton by Sake Deen Mohammed (1750-1851). In addition to workers and traders, in the late 19th century, started to go well into English intellectual group. This can be seen when the period between 1893 until 1908, a weekly journal of Islamic nuanced, The Crescent, began to spread in Liverpool. The founder of this journal is William Henry Quilliam (which in the Muslim community is known as Sheikh Abdullah Quillam), who is a lawyer. He converted to Islam in 1887 after a long settled in Algeria and Morocco. Coupled with a wave of Muslim migration en masse to England in the 1950s.
In 1951, the country's Muslim population estimated to reach 23 thousand inhabitants. Ten years later, the Muslim population in Britain to 82 thousand, and in 1971 has reached 369 thousand inhabitants. Currently, the Muslim population in the UK around 2 million inhabitants. Swelling numbers of this migration, especially from the former British colonies such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, due to the availability of employment opportunities in the UK, especially steel and textile industries are growing rapidly in Yokshire and Lanchasire. Issuance of the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1962, which increasingly provide facilities for UK citizenship to nationals of the former British colony, also helped push the rate of this migration.
The development of Islam and Muslims Position
Before the tragedy of 11 September, the development of Islam in this country very rapidly. In terms of quantity can be seen from the developments mentioned above. Likewise, in terms of quality, the Muslims there are not many get difficulties when trying to implement keberagamaannya. This is supported by the UK government policy which expressly release all its citizens to embrace and implement the teachings of his religion. That is, every British citizen is not restricted and prohibited to embrace a religion of any kind. State does not issue an official religion recognized by the state. Every citizen can embrace any religion (including no religion in it though) even though the new religion, including running the entire teaching. In addition, it supported also by the attitude of British society are very indifferent to the existence of religion as long as they do not feel disturbed. From this end the development of Islam so fast.
However, behind which there is freedom there are wedge-wedge developed collectively by both government and existing groups. For example, until recently, many of the younger generation that the average Muslim from South Asia is experiencing a great struggle is complex, especially related to persoalanan their identity as Muslims. They tend to be easy teralienasikan from frame kemuslimannya as a result of high unemployment, lack of opportunity to acquire education, the quality of faith, the question of women's lives in a public space, the bias of the media perspective to racial issues.
Especially after the tragedy of 11 September 2001, which turned out to give a very great impact for Muslims in Britain. It's no longer about issues, but more than that, acts of racial far only few in number befall the Muslims there, after the tragedy, in terms of quantity more often experienced by Muslims in various sectors of life. Plural racist attitudes seen in places where the cultural center of Islam. It often happens, some of the Muslims who have traveled similar measures at airports or railway stations internationally. To reduce possible negative impacts experienced by the Muslim community, a day after the attack, Prime Minister Tony Blair declared, "a reprehensible act (WTC bombing) was in stark contrast with Islamic values. Vast majority of Muslims are very flexible, honest people, who are also experiencing the same horror of what had happened. "
However, after this tragedy is also a change of government attitude towards the Muslim community. When this has been specially appointed by the British Parliament some experts that was tasked to study Islam in detail to help political decision-making related to the Islamic community. From this position of the Muslims there began experiencing a number of barriers to systemic marginalization.
Utilizing Existing Momentum
If we look deeper, as if the measures taken by Prime Minister Tony Blair related to domestic and foreign policies contradict one another. However, if traced further, it turns out what is retrieved instead mutually reinforcing. Indeed, if judging from his foreign policy, the British tend against Islam. This condition is seen in how the UK with the U.S. insistence on attacking Afghanistan and Iraq which explicitly implies hatred for Islam. Not to the roots of history, which destroyed Daula Inggrislah Khilfah Islamiyah in Istanbul Turkey. Through the cruel conspiracy along with his minions (Mustafa Kemal, etc.), they are berlahan but certainly further undermine and overthrow the Caliphate as well as replacing it with British-style secular government. From here can be understood why in the framework of its foreign policy, Britain was 'dark eyes' of Islamic countries.
However, the opposite policy, namely to protect Muslims, captured in the British domestic political policy. Not only Muslims who have long become citizens, but Muslim leaders escape from various Muslim countries could also be easily obtain asylum to further continue its activities as is done in his native country. That is, all Muslims, as long as he remains a British citizen, will always be defended and protected, both when he was in British territory or not. Although their ideas are very opposed or tended to contradict the government's policies, they are free to do so.
Policies that seems ambiguous between one another, if we trace further not contradict each other. Indeed, there is in accordance with the doctrine of his foreign policy, namely to protect the security and enhance British influence in the international community, as well as support the creation of an international order that an orderly and safe.
However, in practical policy on emerging as a result of the first: UK institution to regulate and protect the freedom of every individual to express and issue opinions. The British government wanted to remain self-image as a democratic state that continues to uphold democratic principles and human rights. Therefore, every citizen is guaranteed freedom despite contrary opinions issued by the government or even tend to be insulting. As an example of what happens in a demonstration against Blair's policy of attacking Iraq. The protesters describe Blair as Bush's stooge with replication Bush as host, while Blair as a pet dog. This humiliation was not prosecuted at all by the government. This condition shows how freedom of expression is upheld. Islamic figures can freely without any sense of worry-affected legislation convey anti-subversive-Islamic ideas that in fact contradict frontally with secular ideology promoted by the British government. With this freedom also, they can easily convey the ideas of Islam to the general public and then invite them to apply Islamic law in everyday life.
Second, to deal with American politics. We know very well that the Islamic leaders who are vocal in essence, constantly attacking U.S. politics. These conditions produce benefits for the UK. Although there is no difference ideologically, there is a difference between the UK with U.S. interests, either in economics or in some other cases. This difference is then triggered the British tried to translate its policy for its foreign policy doctrine still achieved. On the one hand English is loyal U.S. ally who will always be asked for help to solve existing problems. But on the other hand, Britain is actually a U.S. rival to be reckoned with. UK foreign policy similar to the U.S. clearly will lead to any conflicts of interest. An example is in case of dispute about economic interests in the Middle East. Britain has long been planted its agents in the Middle East to secure its interests. However, since the Gulf War I had ended, stability and existence of the interests of British agents in the Middle East began to shift or even eroded by the interests and U.S. agents. Oil fields and other crops began to be sucked into the U.S.. Not to mention the level of loyalty of the leaders in Muslim countries. At first, we can be sure that they all were British agents. However, post-Gulf War I his condition began to change. They began to give their loyalty to the U.S.. This condition is very detrimental to British interests.
From here why in the end with the introduction of Islamic leaders who are critical of the U.S. in the UK would be 'blessing' for the UK alone. Their presence then transformed into a form of real support from one of the components of society to win the competition with the U.S.. In addition, they also become places of production 'weapon' powerful criticism easily available to be used to criticize U.S. policy. However, this policy would also be a 'blessing' the other for the development of Islam in Britain.
From here it is clear, that although the look contradictory, essentially foreign and domestic policy of England remains the same, namely to the progress and glory of England alone
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
